Radiological Explorations of Patients with Upper or Febrile Urinary Tract Infection.

Recent European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines and a clinical prediction rule developed by Van Nieuwkoop et al. suggest simple criteria for performing radiological imaging for patients with a febrile urinary tract infection (UTI). We analysed the records of patients with a UTI from four hospitals in Switzerland. Of 107 UTI patients, 58% underwent imaging and 69% (95%CI: 59-77%) and 64% (95%CI: 54-73%) of them were adequately managed according to Van Nieuwkoop's clinical rule and EAU guidelines, respectively. However, only 47% (95%CI: 33-61%) and 57% (95%CI: 44-69%) of the imaging performed would have been recommended according to their respective rules. Clinically significant imaging findings were associated with a history of urolithiasis (OR = 11.8; 95%CI: 3.0-46.5), gross haematuria (OR = 5.9; 95%CI: 1.6-22.1) and known urogenital anomalies (OR = 5.7; 95%CI: 1.8-18.2). Moreover, six of 16 (38%) patients with a clinically relevant abnormality displayed none of the criteria requiring imaging according to Van Nieuwkoop's rule or EAU guidelines. Thus, adherence to imaging guidelines was suboptimal, especially when imaging was not recommended. However, additional factors associated with clinically significant findings suggest the need for a new, efficient clinical prediction rule.

The Early HOSPITAL Score to Predict 30-Day Readmission Soon After Hospitalization: a Prospective Multicenter Study.

BACKGROUND: The simplified HOSPITAL score is an easy-to-use prediction model to identify patients at high risk of 30-day readmission before hospital discharge. An earlier stratification of this risk would allow more preparation time for transitional care interventions. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the simplified HOSPITAL score would perform similarly by using hemoglobin and sodium level at the time of admission instead of discharge. DESIGN: Prospective national multicentric cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: In total, 934 consecutively discharged medical inpatients from internal general services. MAIN MEASURES: We measured the composite of the first unplanned readmission or death within 30 days after discharge of index admission and compared the performance of the simplified score with lab at discharge (simplified HOSPITAL score) and lab at admission (early HOSPITAL score) according to their discriminatory power (Area Under the Receiver Operating characteristic Curve (AUROC)) and the Net Reclassification Improvement (NRI). KEY RESULTS: During the study period, a total of 3239 patients were screened and 934 included. In total, 122 (13.2%) of them had a 30-day unplanned readmission or death. The simplified and the early versions of the HOSPITAL score both showed very good accuracy (Brier score 0.11, 95%CI 0.10-0.13). Their AUROC were 0.66 (95%CI 0.60-0.71), and 0.66 (95%CI 0.61-0.71), respectively, without a statistical difference (p value 0.79). Compared with the model at discharge, the model with lab at admission showed improvement in classification based on the continuous NRI (0.28; 95%CI 0.08 to 0.48; p value 0.004). CONCLUSION: The early HOSPITAL score performs, at least similarly, in identifying patients at high risk for 30-day unplanned readmission and allows a readmission risk stratification early during the hospital stay. Therefore, this new version offers a timely preparation of transition care interventions to the patients who may benefit the most.

Association of part-time clinical work with well-being and mental health in General Internal Medicine: A survey among Swiss hospitalists.

INTRODUCTION: Burnout and low job satisfaction are increasing among the General Internal Medicine (GIM) workforce. Whether part-time compared to full-time clinical employment is associated with better wellbeing, job satisfaction and health among hospitalists remains unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an anonymized cross-sectional survey among board-certified general internists (i.e. hospitalists) from GIM departments in 14 Swiss hospitals. Part-time clinical work was defined as employment of <100% as a clinician. The primary outcome was well-being, as measured by the extended Physician Well-Being Index (ePWBI), an ePWBI ≥3 indicating poor wellbeing. Secondary outcomes included depressive symptoms, mental and physical health, and job satisfaction. We compared outcomes in part-time and full time workers using propensity score-adjusted multivariate regression models. RESULTS: Of 199 hospitalists invited, 137 (69%) responded to the survey, and 124 were eligible for analysis (57 full-time and 67 part-time clinicians). Full-time clinicians were more likely to have poor wellbeing compared to part-time clinicians (ePWBI ≥3 54% vs. 31%, p = 0.012). Part-time compared to full-time clinical work was associated with a lower risk of poor well-being in adjusted analyses (odds ratio 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.07-0.59, p = 0.004). Compared to full-time clinicians, there were fewer depressive symptoms (3% vs. 18%, p = 0.006), and mental health was better (mean SF-8 Mental Component Summary score 47.2 vs. 43.2, p = 0.028) in part-time clinicians, without significant differences in physical health and job satisfaction. CONCLUSIONS: Full-time clinical hospitalists in GIM have a high risk of poor well-being. Part-time compared to full-time clinical work is associated with better well-being and mental health, and fewer depressive symptoms.

Does the advertisement in Swiss pharmacy windows rest on evidence-based medicine? An observational study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyse the proportion of evidence-based medication displayed in pharmacies and compare it between the different linguistic regions of the country, at different times of the year to determine the amount of proven effective medications indirectly recommended to the public in different parts of Switzerland. DESIGN: This is an observational study conducted by medical doctors in the department of internal medicine at the Spitalzentrum Biel, Switzerland. SETTING: The observation took place from July 2019 to May 2020. From a total of 1800 pharmacies in Switzerland, 68 different pharmacies were selected across the 3 main linguistic regions and the medication on display in their windows were examined 4 times a year regarding their efficacy. The displays of medication with or without evidence-based efficacy were described using absolute numbers and proportions and compared between the different linguistic regions at different seasons using χ2. PARTICIPANTS: There were no human or animal participants involved in this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is the proportion of medication displayed in pharmacy windows with a proven effectiveness in medical literature. The secondary outcome was the variability of the primary outcome over time (seasonal changes), over the different linguistic regions of Switzerland and between chains and privately owned pharmacies. RESULTS: We examined 970 medications and found that over the whole year, there is a high proportion of non-evidence-based drugs (56,9%) displayed in pharmacies. Swiss German cantons display significantly more non-evidence-based medications in winter. We found no statistical difference for other seasons or between chains and privately owned pharmacies. CONCLUSION: Pharmacies in Switzerland tend to display significantly more non-evidence-based drugs, thus indirectly recommending them to the public. In a time of necessary expansion of self-medication by the population, this could incite consumers to buy drugs without proven effectiveness.

Factors associated with one-year mortality after hospital discharge: A multicenter prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To identify predictors of one-year mortality in hospitalized medical patients using factors available during their hospital stay. 2) To evaluate whether healthcare system use within 30 days of hospital discharge is associated with one-year mortality. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: This prospective, observational study included adult patients from four mid-sized hospital general internal medicine units. During index hospitalization, we retrieved patient characteristics, including demographic and socioeconomic indicators, diagnoses, and early simplified HOSPITAL scores from electronic health records and patient interviews. Data on healthcare system use was collected using telephone interviews 30 days after discharge. Survival status at one year was collected by telephone and from health records. We used a univariable analysis including variables available from the hospitalization and 30-day post-discharge periods. We then performed multivariable analyses with one model using index hospitalization data and one using 30-day post-discharge data. RESULTS: Of 934 patients, 123 (13.2%; 95% CI 11.0-15.4%) were readmitted or died within 30 days. Of 814 patients whose primary outcome was available, 108 died (13.3%) within one year. Using factors obtained during hospitalization, the early simplified HOSPITAL score (OR 1.50; 95% CI 1.31-1.71; P < 0.001) and not living at home (OR 4.0; 95% CI 1.8-8.3; P < 0.001) were predictors of one-year mortality. Using 30-day post-discharge predictors, hospital readmission was significantly associated with one-year mortality (OR 4.81; 95% CI 2.77-8.33; P < 0.001). SIGNIFICANCE: Factors predicting one-year mortality were a high early simplified HOSPITAL score, not living at home, and a 30-day unplanned readmission.

Effects of a Multimodal Transitional Care Intervention in Patients at High Risk of Readmission: The TARGET-READ Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Hospital readmissions are frequent, costly, and sometimes preventable. Although these issues have been well publicized and incentives to reduce them introduced, the best interventions for reducing readmissions remain unclear. Objectives: To evaluate the effects of a multimodal transitional care intervention targeting patients at high risk of hospital readmission on the composite outcome of 30-day unplanned readmission or death. Design, Setting, and Participants: A single-blinded, multicenter randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2018 to January 2020, with a 30-day follow-up in 4 medium-to-large-sized teaching hospitals in Switzerland. Participants were consecutive patients discharged from general internal medicine wards and at higher risk of unplanned readmission based on their simplified HOSPITAL score (≥4 points). Data were analyzed between April and September 2022. Interventions: The intervention group underwent systematic medication reconciliation, a 15-minute patient education session with teach-back, a planned first follow-up visit with their primary care physician, and postdischarge follow-up telephone calls from the study team at 3 and 14 days. The control group received usual care from their hospitalist, plus a 1-page standard study information sheet. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thirty-day postdischarge unplanned readmission or death. Results: A total of 1386 patients were included with a mean (SD) age of 72 (14) years; 712 (51%) were male. The composite outcome of 30-day unplanned readmission or death was 21% (95% CI, 18% to 24%) in the intervention group and 19% (95% CI, 17% to 22%) in the control group. The intention-to-treat analysis risk difference was 1.7% (95% CI, -2.5% to 5.9%; P = .44). There was no evidence of any intervention effects on time to unplanned readmission or death, postdischarge health care use, patient satisfaction with the quality of their care transition, or readmission costs. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, use of a standardized multimodal care transition intervention targeting higher-risk patients did not significantly decrease the risks of 30-day postdischarge unplanned readmission or death; it demonstrated the difficulties in preventing hospital readmissions, even when multimodal interventions specifically target higher-risk patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03496896.

Effectiveness of Transition Care Intervention Targeted to High-Risk Patients to Reduce Readmissions: Study Protocol for the TARGET-READ Multicenter Randomized-Controlled Trial.

Hospital readmissions within 30 days represent a burden for the patients and the entire health care system. Improving the care around hospital discharge period could decrease the risk of avoidable readmissions. We describe the methods of a trial that aims to evaluate the effect of a structured multimodal transitional care intervention targeted to higher-risk medical patients on 30-day unplanned readmissions and death. The TARGET-READ study is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic single-blinded randomized multicenter controlled trial with two parallel groups. We include all adult patients at risk of hospital readmission based on a simplified HOSPITAL score of ≥4 who are discharged home or nursing home after a hospital stay of one day or more in the department of medicine of the four participating hospitals. The patients randomized to the intervention group will receive a pre-discharge intervention by a study nurse with patient education, medication reconciliation, and follow-up appointment with their referring physician. They will receive short follow-up phone calls at 3 and 14 days after discharge to ensure medication adherence and follow-up by the ambulatory care physician. A blind study nurse will collect outcomes at 1 month by phone call interview. The control group will receive usual care. The TARGET-READ study aims to increase the knowledge about the efficacy of a bundled intervention aimed at reducing 30-day hospital readmission or death in higher-risk medical patients.

[Number needed to treat: a useful toolto evaluate the effectiveness of a treatment?] / Number Needed to Treat : un bon outil pour évaluer l'utilité d'un médicament ?

This article reviews the clinical implications and limitations of the number needed to treat (NNT). Clinicians can quickly use this rather intuitive statistical value to assess the expected effectiveness of a treatment and explain it to patients. However, careful attention must be paid to the outcomes used in defining an NNT, as well as, the rate of the specific event in the population and the duration of observation. Conflicts of interest may also affect this easily manipulated statistical tool. Some often prescribed treatments have an NNT well above 20, implying an uncertain benefit for the patient, which emphasizes the need to carefully weigh the risk-benefit balance (NNT vs. NNH: number needed to harm) when prescribing. This review shows particularly low NNTs for anti-infectious agents compared to other drugs frequently used in medical practice.

Cet article revoit les implications cliniques et les limitations du NNT (Number Needed to Treat). C'est une valeur intuitive rapidement utilisable afin d'évaluer l'efficacité attendue d'un traitement et facilement abordable pour le patient. Cependant, on restera très attentif aux issues cliniques étudiées, au risque de base de l'événement dans la population et à la durée d'observation utilisés. Des conflits d'intérêts peuvent aussi affecter cet outil statistique facilement manipulable. Certains traitements largement prescrits présentent un NNT au-delà de 20, donc un bénéfice incertain pour le patient, imposant de soigneusement peser la balance risques-bénéfices (NNT vs NNH (Number Needed to Harm)) lors de la prescription initiale. Le NNT est particulièrement bas pour les agents anti-infectieux, comparés à d'autres traitements courants.

[Infectious diseases as you have never read them (second part )]. / L'infectiologie comme vous ne l'avez jamais lue (la suite ).

The Covid-19 epidemic has turned our lives upside down; surprisingly certain aspects of this infection can also make you smile, as well as certain modes of transmission of infectious agents that we have grouped together in the form of an original "blooper" of infectious diseases.

L'épidémie de Covid-19 a bouleversé notre vie. Étonnamment, certains aspects de cette infection peuvent aussi faire sourire, tout comme certains modes de transmission d'agents infectieux que nous avons regroupés sous la forme d'un « bêtisier ¼ original des maladies infectieuses.

Urinary culture sensitivity after a single empirical antibiotic dose for upper or febrile urinary tract infection: A prospective multicentre observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Urinary culture sensitivity after antibiotics administration is unknown. This study aimed to describe the diagnostic sensitivity of urine cultures from patients' first, second, and third micturition samples after a single dose of empirical antibiotics given for upper and/or febrile urinary tract infections, as well as searched for factors influencing diagnostic sensitivity over time. METHODS: We collected consecutive urine samples from adult patients with an upper or febrile urinary tract infection diagnosed at four secondary hospital emergency rooms. One sample was collected before a first dose of empirical antibiotic treatment and up to three samples were collected from consecutive postadministration micturition. The main outcome was the number of positive cultures growing uropathogens with ≥103 colony forming units (CFUs) for men and ≥104 for women. Identical analyses were performed for any identified CFU and ≥105 CFU cut-off points. Time between antibiotic administration and first negative urinary culture was noted, which could have been at the time of any of the three postantibiotic urine samples. We used a Cox regression analysis for age- and sex-adjusted analyses. RESULTS: A total of 86 of 87 patients' preantibiotic cultures (99%) were positive compared with 26 of 75 (35%; p < 0.001), 15 of 50 (30%; p < 0.001), and 1 of 15 (7%; p < 0.001) of the first, second, and third postantibiotic samples, respectively, and missing 14 of 21 (67%), 13 of 17 (76%), and 7 of 7 (100%) of uropathogens with antibiotic resistance, respectively. The times needed for 25%, 50%, and 75% of cultures to be negative were 1.5, 2.9, and 9 hours, respectively, after antibiotic administration. Older age, male sex, non-Escherichia coli pathogens, urinary tract disease, comorbidity burdens, and urinary catheters prolonged time to negative culture, but were not significantly associated after adjustment. Uropathogens were found at ≥105 CFU in 15 of 75 (20%), 7 of 50 (14%), and 0 of 15 (0%) of the three postantibiotic micturition samples, respectively, and in any identified CFU in 48 of 75 (64%), 23 of 50 (46%), and 1 of 15 (7%), respectively. CONCLUSION: Urinary culture sensitivity decreases rapidly after administering antibiotics.

The well-being of Swiss general internal medicine residents.

BACKGROUND: Physician well-being has an impact on productivity and quality of care. Residency training is a particularly stressful period. OBJECTIVE: To assess the well-being of general internal medicine (GIM) residents and its association with personal and work-related factors. METHODS: We conducted an anonymous electronic survey among GIM residents from 13 Swiss teaching hospitals. We explored the association between a reduced well-being (≥5 points based on the Physician Well-Being Index [PWBI]) and personal and work-related factors using multivariable mixed-effects logistic regression. RESULTS: The response rate was 54% (472/880). Overall, 19% of residents had a reduced well-being, 60% felt burned out (emotional exhaustion), 47% were worried that their work was hardening them emotionally (depersonalisation), and 21% had career choice regret. Age (odds ratio [OR] 1.19, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05–1.34), working hours per week (OR 1.04 per hour, 95% CI 1.01–1.07) and <2.5 rewarding work hours per day (OR 3.73, 95% CI 2.01–6.92) were associated with reduced well-being. Administrative workload and satisfaction with the electronic medical record were not. We found significant correlations between PWBI score and job satisfaction (rs = -0.54, p<0.001), medical errors (rs = 0.18, p<0.001), suicidal ideation (rs = 0.12, p = 0.009) and the intention to leave clinical practice (rs = 0.38, p <0.001) CONCLUSIONS: Approximately 20% of Swiss GIM residents appear to have a reduced well-being and many show signs of distress or have career choice regret. Having few hours of rewarding work and a high number of working hours were the most important modifiable predictors of reduced well-being. Healthcare organisations have an ethical responsibility to implement interventions to improve physician well-being.

[Antiviral therapy for general practitioners]. / Traitements antiviraux pour le praticien.

Viral infections are extremely common and generally self-restricted, thus antiviral therapy is limited to precise indications. Apart from HIV (not reviewed in this article), the principal treatable viruses are HSV 1 and 2, VZV, CMV, Influenza A and B, and hepatitis B and C. Vaccination is another cornerstone of viral infections control. This article summarizes actual and available therapy. New treatments arrived recently on the market or are being developed : HCV can now be treated with a high success rate, baloxavir against the flu, a new zoster vaccine will probably soon be available in Switzerland and letermovir improves CMV prophylaxis in the case of hematopoietic stem cell transplant.

Les infections virales sont extrêmement fréquentes et guérissent le plus souvent spontanément. Un traitement antiviral est réservé à des indications précises. A l'exception du VIH (non abordé dans cet article), les principaux virus traitables sont : herpès simplex 1 et 2 (HSV-1 et 2), Varicella zoster (VZV), cytomégalovirus (CMV), influenza A et B ainsi que les virus des hépatites B et C. La vaccination est une autre stratégie de lutte importante. Ce domaine étant en plein développement, cet article effectue un survol des traitements actuellement disponibles sur le marché suisse. Durant ces dernières années, l'hépatite C a pu être traitée avec un haut taux de succès. Le baloxavir contre la grippe et un nouveau vaccin contre le zona seront sans doute prochainement disponibles en Suisse. Le letermovir améliore la prophylaxie du CMV en cas de transplantation de moelle osseuse.

[Drug fever among Swiss' most sold drugs in primary care]. / Fièvre médicamenteuse en médecine de premier recours liée aux médicaments les plus vendus en Suisse.

Drug fever is a little known side effect and should be considered as a differential diagnosis in the presence of fever. Its early recognition is important to avoid unnecessary investigations. Among the 70 most prescribed drugs in primary care in Switzerland, 8 have been linked to drug fever : amoxicillin, atorvastatin, rosuvastatin, esomeprazole, pantoprazole, rivaroxaban, salbutamol and trazodone. There are no specific criterias to distinguish a drug-induced fever. The diagnosis is confirmed with a positive rechallenge test. If a drug fever is suspected, it is recommended to stop the offending agent.

La fièvre d'origine médicamenteuse fait partie du diagnostic différentiel de toute fièvre et est un effet secondaire peu reconnu. Son évocation précoce est importante et permet d'éviter des examens secondaires inutiles. Parmi les 70 substances les plus vendues en ambulatoire en Suisse de 2008 à 2016, 8 médicaments peuvent provoquer de la fièvre : l'amoxicilline, l'atorvastatine, la rosuvastatine, l'esoméprazole, le pantoprazole, le rivaroxaban, le salbutamol et la trazodone. Il n'y a pas de critère défini de la fièvre médicamenteuse et aucun signe clinique ou valeur de laboratoire n'est spécifique à un état fébrile secondaire à un médicament. Seul un test de réexposition positif permet de confirmer définitivement le diagnostic. En cas de suspicion de fièvre médicamenteuse, l'arrêt immédiat de la substance est recommandé.

Transient global amnesia following a whole-body cryotherapy session.

Whole-body cryotherapy (WBC), which consists of a short exposure to very cold and dry air in special 'cryo-chambers', is believed to reduce inflammation and musculoskeletal pain as well as improve athletes' recovery. This is the case of a 63-year-old male, who presented with transient global amnesia (TGA) after undertaking a WBC session. TGA is a clinical syndrome characterised by a sudden onset of anterograde amnesia, sometimes coupled with a retrograde component, lasting up to 24 hours without other neurological deficits. Even though the patient completely recovered, as expected, in 24 hours, this case highlights that WBC is potentially not as risk free as thought to be initially. To conclude, before WBC can be medically recommended, well-conducted studies investigating the possible adverse events are required.

[Shortening the antibiotherapy is in progress: get up to date!] / La durée de l'antibiothérapie diminue : restons à jour !

In a world where the emergence of resistant bacteria threatens the future use of many antibiotics, it is now critical to prescribe antibiotics carefully in order to minimize selective pressure. Limiting treatment duration would be one of the strategies to achieve this goal. Recent studies state that a reduction of the course of treatment is showing great benefit with no outcome difference.

Dans un contexte où les antibiotiques sont menacés par l'émergence de résistances bactériennes, il semble essentiel de développer des mesures pour une meilleure gestion de ces derniers, ce qui se résume par le concept d'antibiotic stewardship. Un des moyens de parvenir à cet objectif est la réduction de la durée de l'antibiothérapie. A cet effet, des études récentes ont énoncé des arguments en faveur de durées réduites de traitement.

[Infectious diseases as you have never read them]. / L'infectiologie comme vous ne l'avez jamais lue.

Infectious diseases is known as a serious medical discipline. Nevertheless some experiences related by patients and unusual studies can bring a smile on your face. In this article, you will find a sample of rare and original studies in this field, extracted from a collection of comical published medical articles.

L'infectiologie est une discipline de réputation sérieuse, pourtant certaines études originales ou les expériences des patients adressés pour une maladie infectieuse peuvent parfois faire sourire. Sorti d'une collection d'articles rares et originaux, vous trouverez ci-après un échantillon de particularités infectiologiques que vous ne trouverez pas ailleurs.